Free Conducting Threat Hunting and Defending using Cisco Technologies for Cybersecurity Practice Questions
100 free questions · Answer explanations · No signup required
View examination details, outline and sourcesLoading selected examination banks…
Sample Practice Questions
Try these 10 sample questions from the Conducting Threat Hunting and Defending using Cisco Technologies for Cybersecurity practice bank. Each includes the answer and explanation. Continue with the interactive practice above to review the full question set.
1A hunt team collects detailed telemetry but normally executes procedures designed by other teams. Which Hunting Maturity Model level best describes this capability?
- A.HMM2, ProceduralCorrect answer: A
- B.HMM0, Initial
- C.HMM3, Innovative
- D.HMM4, Leading
2A hunter must model an application's components and how data moves between them before identifying threats. Which representation directly supports this task?
- A.An attack tree of alternative intrusion paths
- B.A data flow diagramCorrect answer: B
- C.A CVSS vector describing vulnerability severity
- D.A Cyber Kill Chain map of intrusion stages
Explanation: The source states, "data flow diagrams (DFDs)". A DFD represents components and data interactions. Attack trees organize attack paths, CVSS vectors describe severity, and Kill Chain maps organize intrusion stages rather than application data flows.
Reference: OWASP Threat Modeling Cheat Sheet — System Modeling
3A compromised host runs net user /domain. What behavior should the hunter initially map from that command?
- A.Creation of a new local account
- B.Enumeration of domain account informationCorrect answer: B
- C.Modification of a domain password policy
- D.Deletion of an existing domain account
4A PowerShell hunt repeatedly reads a large Windows event log and then pipes every record to Where-Object. Which change directly improves filtering efficiency?
- A.Sort the full event stream before filtering
- B.Convert every event to formatted text first
- C.Use Get-WinEvent with a FilterHashtable queryCorrect answer: C
- D.Read the same log twice and compare counts
Explanation: The source states, "Performance improves when a Get-WinEvent query uses the FilterHashtable parameter.". FilterHashtable narrows the event query directly. Formatting, sorting or rereading the full stream adds work instead of reducing it.
Reference: Microsoft Get-WinEvent FilterHashtable queries — FilterHashtable introduction
5An incident plan permits live acquisition from a stable host, and suspected malicious code may exist only in RAM. No immediate safety action requires shutdown. What should the investigator prioritize before powering it off?
- A.Acquire only a forensic image of the persistent disk
- B.Collect the relevant volatile memory evidenceCorrect answer: B
- C.Export only the persistent Registry hive files
- D.Collect only the event logs already saved on disk
Explanation: The source states, "Volatile data refers to data on a live system that is lost after a computer is powered down". Under the permitted live-acquisition conditions, collect the relevant RAM evidence before shutdown. Disk images, persistent hive files and saved logs do not preserve RAM-only code.
Reference: NIST SP 800-86 Integrating Forensic Techniques into Incident Response — section 3.1, Volatility
6A hunt links a malicious email, endpoint process activity and outbound network traffic to the same affected host. What is the main investigative benefit of integrating those product observations?
- A.Increasing the count of independent alerts
- B.Replacing all raw evidence with a common severity number
- C.Reconstructing related activity across security domainsCorrect answer: C
- D.Treating every shared IP as the same malicious process
Explanation: The source states, "collect and correlate data". Cross-domain correlation builds incident context that separate observations lack. Alert count or a common severity label does not itself reconstruct relationships, and shared IPs require contextual validation.
Reference: Cisco XDR product documentation — Cisco XDR overview
7A team wants to move from following published hunts to HMM3. Which improvement directly demonstrates that change?
- A.Increase the amount of searchable telemetry
- B.Create novel hunt procedures internallyCorrect answer: B
- C.Execute established hunt procedures more frequently
- D.Automate most hunts into continuous detections
Explanation: The source states, "creating novel hunt procedures". Original hunt design demonstrates HMM3. Alert subscriptions do not show that capability, and universal automation is neither the stated milestone nor justified.
Reference: Measuring Hunting Success with PEAK — Measuring Program Maturity
8A team has mapped components, data flows and trust boundaries and wants systematic security-threat prompts for each. Which approach is the best fit?
- A.Use CVSS to assign vulnerability severity vectors
- B.Use the Kill Chain to identify intrusion stages
- C.Apply STRIDE categories to the modelCorrect answer: C
- D.Use the Pyramid of Pain to rank indicator types
Explanation: The source states, "components, data flows, and trust boundaries". In its STRIDE guidance, these elements receive systematic threat-category analysis. Severity vectors, intrusion stages and indicator difficulty address different questions.
Reference: OWASP Threat Modeling Cheat Sheet — Choosing a Threat Modeling Technique, STRIDE
9A log records schtasks /create with an ONLOGON trigger pointing to an attacker-controlled executable. Which mechanism is being configured?
- A.A Windows service start type
- B.A Registry Run value
- C.A scheduled task for logon executionCorrect answer: C
- D.An inbound RDP listener
Explanation: The source states, "task scheduling for initial or recurring execution". The schtasks command and logon trigger establish scheduled execution. Service, Registry Run and RDP configuration are different mechanisms.
Reference: MITRE ATT&CK Scheduled Task — Description and APT3 procedure example
10A Python hunt reads newline-delimited JSON logs. For each line containing one JSON object, which operation converts its text into a Python object for field-based analysis?
Exam Review
About Conducting Threat Hunting and Defending using Cisco Technologies for Cybersecurity
Conducting Threat Hunting and Defending using Cisco Technologies for Cybersecurity · US
Key exam facts
- Provider
- Cisco owns the examination; Pearson VUE is Cisco's testing delivery partner.
- Format
- Proctored computer-delivered exam, at Pearson VUE test centers or online through OnVUE in the US. Published formats include performance-based questions, multiple choice and drag-and-drop; no CBRTHD-specific percentage mix is published.
- Time limit
- 90 minutes of examination time.
- Passing score
- Pass/fail. Cisco sets passing scores statistically and does not publish them; no fixed numerical passing threshold or score scale is given in the published scoring policy.
- Exam fee
- US$300 for the 300-220 CBRTHD examination, or redeem Cisco Learning Credits.
Topics covered
Threat Hunting Fundamentals (20%)
- Apply the Threat Hunting Maturity Model to an organization's environment, as it relates to the Pyramid of Pain
- Describe threats and how to model them with standards such as MITRE ATT&CK, MITRE CAPEC, TaHiTI, and PASTA
- Describe the limiting factors of detection tools for malware behavior, propagation, and detection
- Describe the advantages and disadvantages of automation such as artificial intelligence and machine learning in the operation of a SOC
- Determine differences in tactics, techniques, and procedures of an advanced persistent threat and threat actor using logs
- Interpret a threat intelligence report and draw conclusions about a threat actor (known advanced persistent threat/commodity human-driven/commodity machine-driven)
- tactics
- techniques
- procedures
Threat Modeling Techniques (10%)
- Select the threat modeling approach for a given scenario
- Use MITRE ATT&CK to model threats (tactics, techniques, and procedures or changes in tactics, techniques, and procedures)
- Describe the uses of structured and unstructured threat hunting
- Determine the priority level of attacks based on the Cyber Kill Chain and MITRE ATT&CK
- Determine the priority level of attacks based on the MITRE CAPEC model
- Perform threat intelligence handling: gathering, cataloging, utilizing, and removing
Threat Actor Attribution Techniques (20%)
- Determine attack tactics, techniques, and procedures using logs
- Interpret tactics, techniques and procedures of a given threat actor
- Select the delivery method, payload, tactic, or timeline that indicates an authorized assessment or an attack (threat actor or penetration tester)
- Determine usable artifacts for detection of advanced persistent threat actors at all levels of the Pyramid of Pain
- tactics
- techniques
- procedures
Threat Hunting Techniques (20%)
- Use scripting languages such as Python and PowerShell to augment detection or analytics
- Perform a cloud-native threat hunt
- Determine undetected threats using SIEM data and endpoint artifacts
- Determine the C2 communications to and from infected hosts using endpoint applications, processes, and logs
- Select suspicious activity using session and protocol data
- Determine the stage of infection within C2 communications using traffic data
- Select weakness in code using code-level analysis tools such as PE Checker, BURP Suite, and SEM Grep
- Describe the analysis process for applications and operating systems used by IoT devices
- Describe memory-resident attacks and how to perform analysis using memory-specific tools such as volatility
- Construct a signature for detection or analysis
- Recognize the likelihood of attack by an attack vector within a given environment
Threat Hunting Processes (20%)
- Describe the process to identify memory-resident attacks
- Determine compromises by reverse engineering
- Determine known and unknown gaps in detection
- vulnerabilities
- configuration errors
- threats
- Interpret data from memory-specific tools
- Construct a runbook or playbook to address a detectable scenario
- Recommend tools, configurations, detection, and deception techniques for a given scenario
- Recommend attack remediation strategies based on the results of a threat assessment
- Recommend changes to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of a threat hunt
- Recommend security countermeasures and mitigations for identified risks
Threat Hunting Outcomes (10%)
- Describe how multiproduct integration enhances data visibility within a product and accelerates analysis
- Diagnose analytical gaps using threat hunting methodologies
- Recommend a mitigation strategy to block C2 traffic
- Recommend changes in hunt capability to advance to the next Threat Hunting Maturity Model phase
- Recommend changes to a detection methodology to augment analytical and process gaps
- Use presentation resources to convey findings and direct environmental change
How to prepare
Work through the topics, read the explanation after each answer, and revisit the areas where you miss questions. Use the official outline and reference materials below to guide your study.
These independent practice questions are not actual exam items and do not guarantee a passing result.
Frequently asked questions
What is the exam format?
Proctored computer-delivered exam, at Pearson VUE test centers or online through OnVUE in the US. Published formats include performance-based questions, multiple choice and drag-and-drop; no CBRTHD-specific percentage mix is published.
How long is the exam?
90 minutes of examination time.
What is the passing score?
Pass/fail. Cisco sets passing scores statistically and does not publish them; no fixed numerical passing threshold or score scale is given in the published scoring policy.
How much does the exam cost?
US$300 for the 300-220 CBRTHD examination, or redeem Cisco Learning Credits.
Official sources and references
- Cisco CBRTHD v1.0 complete exam topics
page 1, title
- Cisco CBRTHD v1.0 complete exam topics
page 1, content scope notice
- Cisco CBRTHD exam topics and study guide
CBRTHD exam details
- Cisco CBRTHD exam topics and study guide
CBRTHD exam details, Question Types
- Cisco exam testing and certification policies
Exam scoring
- Cisco certification exam tutorial
Exam delivery partner
- Pearson VUE Cisco testing program
Exam information (exam types)
Confirm current exam arrangements with the exam provider.